Muzzling Critical Thought
For years, the Arab Gulf states and Iran have been arguing about the name of the gulf that borders their countries, about whether it is called the Persian Gulf or the Arabian Gulf.
The small island nation of Bahrain – the word "Bahrain" means "two seas" – not only lies geographically in the middle of this contentious body of water, it is also in the middle culturally, religiously, and politically too, influenced both by Shi'ite Iran and the mainly Sunni Arab Gulf states. The differences are further compounded by the fact that although Shi'ites make up almost 70 per cent of the population in Bahrain, political power centres on the country's Sunni ruling dynasty.
Elections in the Arab world are rare; free elections in the Arab world are even more rare, and even though the Bahraini lower house wields little legislative power, it was nevertheless something special that a parliament was elected in the constitutional monarchy last Saturday for the third time following elections in 2002 and 2006.
The Shi'ite group Wifaq took 18 of the 40 seats in the lower house in the recent election, thereby confirming the trend begun in the last election. Despite the fact that this result means that Wifaq retains the majority in the lower house, its political ability to act is restricted by the constitution. The Shura, the upper house whose members are nominated by the King and is dominated by a Sunni majority, will remain the centre of power in the kingdom after the election.
Conflicts between the government and the Shi'ite minority
The democratic reform process in Bahrain has slowed down enormously in recent years; the opposition is even speaking of regression in this respect. According to the opposition, there were irregularities during the election: voters were surprised to find that their names were suddenly no longer in the electoral register; others were prevented from casting their vote.
In the run-up to the election, there were repeated clashes between the government and members of the Shi'ite minority. Many Shi'ites feel like second-class citizens; in recent weeks, they gave vent to their rage and disappointment about the deterioration in the political climate by organising regular road blocks.
The government reacted in early September by arresting several hundred protesters, including 23 prominent Shi'ite opposition activists, accusing them of terrorist subversive activities.
"The prisoners belong to different political groups," says Mohammed al-Maskati of the Bahrain Youth Society for Human Rights (BYSHR), "but they are all united by the desire for freedom and the firm belief in human rights." After the first wave of arrests in September and after other human rights organisations in Bahrain came under pressure from the government, the BYSHR decided to continue its work from Europe for the time being.
Blogging as a terrorist act
Among the accused are Dr Abdul Jalil Al-Singace, chairman of the Human Rights Commission of the Haqq movement, which has boycotted the elections so far in protest at the constitution imposed by the king, and the young blogger Ali Abdulemam.
Abdulemam, who – according to the Bahraini state press agency – was arrested for "disseminating fictitious and malicious information and rumours about domestic politics in Bahrain, that put the security and stability of the kingdom at risk", was head of the most important opposition Internet discussion forum in Bahrain, Bahrainonline.org, the toleration of which was considered to be the standard by which the increasing openness of the country was measured.
The site, like dozens of other blogger, opposition and human rights organisation sites in Bahrain, has been blocked; Abdulemam has been in prison since early September, and Bahrain has slipped 48 places to 144th on the Reporters Without Borders press freedom index since 2008.
In his blog, Abdulemam was very critical of the government and was not afraid to use drastic words. However, it is likely that it was the even more critical entries of other forum users that were his downfall.
Tight security at the start of the court case
On the opening day of the trial on Thursday, several prisoners, who had not been allowed to make contact with their lawyers, brought charges of torture against the Bahraini security forces. At the start of proceedings, which were opened under incredibly tight security in Manama, all of the accused pleaded not-guilty. After hearings were postponed until 11 November, the prisoners were allowed to contact their lawyers for the first time.
"What we are seeing here is happening because people are being discriminated against because they belong to a certain group and fundamental freedoms and rights have been restricted," says al-Maskati, who criticised that western governments are not doing enough to urge Bahrain to uphold human rights. Al-Maskati is referring here to the US's political interests in the region. The US has stationed its fifth fleet in Bahrain, its last bastion before Iran.
It is unlikely that the US would be keen to see the Shi'ite majority population, which is close to Iran, taking political power in Bahrain. One can assume that this is why Washington is avoiding all criticism that could weaken the Sunni government in any way. So, for the moment, Bahrain's human rights activists and opposition activists are on their own.
© Qantara.de 2010
Translated from the German by Aingeal Flanagan
Editor: Lewis Gropp/Qantara.de