Presidential Election in Afghanistan

Low Point of an Electoral Farce

Following his controversial re-election, the Afghan president Hamid Karsai can expect energetic resistance from the opposition under Abdullah Abdullah. Andreas Zumach finds it easy to understand why Abdullah decided not to take part in the run-off

Hamid Karsai, photo: AP
Dubious candidate: although there has been an increasing chorus of critical voices – even in Washington – over the last few years, the West has held on to Hamid Karsai as if there were no possible alternative

​​ The run-off vote in the Afghan presidential election, which was originally planned for November 7th, has been cancelled, and the incumbent Hamid Karsai has been officially declared the winner of the manipulated first round of voting.

This decision of the Afghan election commission – which is nominally independent but in fact acts according to Karsai's will – brings this two-month electoral farce to a low point beyond which it is scarcely possible to sink.

The credibility of all the participants – the politicians in Kabul, the USA and its Western allies, as well as the UN – has most likely been irreparably destroyed in the eyes of the Afghan people.

That makes the chances of the US-led international Afghanistan mission being able to stabilise the country, shaken as it is by war, terror, the drug trade and corruption, even less likely now than it has ever been since the start of the mission in autumn 2001.

All power to warlords and tribal chiefs

In the last eight years, the West has shown alarming consistency in repeatedly narrowing its own possibilities for action in Afghanistan.

Abdullah Abdullah, photo: AP
Abdullah Abdullah: "A government which has come to power as a result of an illegal decision will not be in a position to fulfil the expectations of the people!"

​​ To start with, the decision to set up a central government in Kabul which was to pacify and take control first of the capital and then of the rest of the country was highly questionable. There has never been a functioning central government in Afghanistan which actually managed to have the whole country under its control.

Power has always rested with local and regional tribal leaders and warlords. But even if it was true eight years ago that there was no alternative to such a centralist strategy, having taken that decision the West then went on to make every mistake they could have made.

With Karsai, they chose a representative of the Pashtun majority as president, without adequate consultation and involvement of the country's ethnic minorities.

Even today, the president has not yet won complete control of Kabul. Karsai's lack of commitment to stamping out corruption and the drug trade – and his own involvement in these basic evils of Afghan society – has been tolerated by the West for far too long.

The president's willing helpers

And although critical voices could be increasingly heard over the last few years, even in Washington, the West has stuck with him as if there were no alternative.

The West remained quiet, not only about the election fraud on August 20th, but also about the fact that Karsai made deals with notorious warlords and drug barons during the election campaign as to the posts they might have in the government and the army if he should win.

The governments of the US and the other NATO countries involved in the Afghanistan war originally intended to declare Karsai the winner in early October.

US President Obama, photo: AP
The vague hope that Karsai might be willing to enter into a government of national unity with Abdullah has become an illusion, now that US President Obama has congratulated Karsai on his "victory in this historic election"

​​ And UN Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon had given his blessing to this charade, thereby clearly acting against the mandate of the UN mission in Afghanistan, whose American deputy head he dismissed because he had insisted on an examination of all cases of alleged electoral fraud.

It's entirely understandable that, under these conditions, Abdullah Abdullah withdrew from the run-off vote.

He had reason to fear that there would be more fraud and manipulation than there had been in the first round, especially since there would be far fewer electoral observers from the UN, the EU and other organisations than there had been in August.

The vague hope that Karsai might be willing to enter into a government of national unity with Abdullah has become an illusion, now that US President Obama has congratulated his Afghan counterpart on his "victory in this historic election."

In retrospect it may prove to be a "historic election" – but in the most negative way.

Andreas Zumach

© Qantara.de 2009

Andreas Zumach, born 1954, is Geneva-based UN correspondent for the German newspaper "die tageszeitung" and a qualified economist, journalist and social worker. His latest publication is "Die kommenden Kriege" ("The Wars of the Future"), published by Kiepenheuer & Witsch.

Print article
Send via mail
Add Comment
In submitting this comment, the reader accepts the following terms and conditions: Qantara.de reserves the right to edit or delete comments or not to publish them. This applies in particular to defamatory, racist, personal, or irrelevant comments or comments written in dialects or languages other than English. Comments submitted by readers using fantasy names or intentionally false names will not be published. Qantara.de will not provide information on the telephone. Readers' comments can be found by Google and other search engines.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.