Beginning with the Crusades and continuing through the colonialism and expansion of empires to todayʹs ideological conflicts and propaganda wars, there have been plenty of reasons for the Islamic world and the West to remain at loggerheads with each other. Wars of invasion by erstwhile dynasties and colonial powers, imperial expansions (from both sides) for economic resources and political dominance have resulted in aggressive military confrontations, breeding mutual hatred, while cementing a deeply entrenched cultural and ideological divide.

But even though Judaism, Christianity and Islam share a degree of common ground, the differences built on such false pretexts have contributed to the myth that Islam belongs to the East while Judeo-Christian traditions belong to the West. This, despite the fact that both Christianity and Judaism, like Islam, originated in the East, or the Middle East to be exact; and that notwithstanding its origin in the Middle East, Islam as a religion or way of life has never shown the characteristic trait of any geography. Islamic geographic fluidity, cultural flexibility and political dynamism can be seen from the diversity with which that religion has been viewed, lived and experienced in different countries and geographies where it established itself as a civilisation.

The narratives of cultural war have focussed on exploring and protecting cultural exclusivity and deepening mutual disbelief, neglecting the opportunities to find out and build on the commonalities and shared values that could potentially unite. Far more has been invested, politically, culturally, economically as well as intellectually, in inflating mutual suspicion to the dizzying heights of antagonism, hatred and warmongering than in concentrating on what unites Islam and Christianity, to say nothing of the common ground shared by Islamic values and the spirit of scientific enquiry and humanism that has prospered in the West over the last five centuries.

This antagonism has been sustained and this myth gradually historicised over a period of decades by a great staple of colonial and post-colonial literature, theories and counter-theories. The myth has become firmly established, condemning to oblivion the historical fact that West and East have complemented each other in the creation of their cultures and civilisations. Even the fresh air of globalisation and modern technology, despite its immense potential to bring the world together, has failed to contain this miasma of mutual suspicion.

Harmony and symbiosis

However, beyond this distorted and convoluted narrative of confrontations and mutual antagonism, there existed and continues to exist, a vast and largely untapped area of mutual co-operation, cultural harmony and symbiosis connecting Islam and Western civilisation as a whole.

Oman-based journalist Mohammed Nafih Wafy (photo: private)
Transcending polarity: "it is high time the world moved away from the confrontational and divisive utopian theories of one ideology or civilisation dominating the other. The future is about exploring the commonalities and living with the differences, instead of deepening the divide," concludes Wafy

Civilisation is not something that was indigenously produced in the Arab world, in isolation from other geographies. Many of the celebrated Islamic thinkers and philosophers of the Middle Ages, when Islamic civilisation is believed to have reached its apogee, were non-Arabs and some of them were influenced by the ancient Greek philosophers. Being neither of the East nor West, this metaphorical ʹestuaryʹ point, a confluence of all the tributaries, served as a fountainhead from which thinkers such as Roger Bacon derived their inspiration for the Renaissance.

The definition of Islam as a civilisation, or as a way of life which is neither of the East nor of the West, cannot be restricted to the exclusivity of any Muslim culture that existed in the past, exists in the present, or shall exist in the future. Time after time, the Koran defines the prophetic mission of Muhammad as an endorsement and continuation of, rather than a break with, all the previous prophets and civilisations.

The Koran maintains that what was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad is meant to endorse and complement, rather than negate or contradict what his predecessors preached. The good relations and mutual co-existence between Muslims and Christians, Jews and other religious minorities who lived during the Middle Ages in much of the Islamic world testify to this.

Seeking the best in humanity

As Muslims are defined by the Koran as the "potentially best human society", Islamic civilisation cannot content itself with anything lesser in quality or mediocre in spirit. Islamic civilisation is therefore by nature something that is still evolving – with geographic fluidity, cultural flexibility and political dynamism – and is thus compatible with any advanced form of civilisation.

It is high time the world moved away from the confrontational and divisive utopian theories of one ideology or civilisation dominating the other. The future is about exploring the commonalities and living with the differences, instead of deepening the divide.

Both the messianic zeal of Muslim extremists, who seek to convert the whole world to their hardcore version of faith sealed with watertight practices, and the hubris of the neo-cons regarding the invincibility, superiority, universality and the eventual triumph of Western ideals over all cultures and civilisations have done a great disservice to fostering intercultural and inter-civilisational peace and harmony in the world.

Muhammed Nafih Wafy

© Qantara.de 2018

Muhammed Nafih Wafy is a journalist and writer currently based in Muscat, Oman. He is the author of "The book of aphorisms: Being a translation of Kitab al-Hikam".

More on this topic
In submitting this comment, the reader accepts the following terms and conditions: Qantara.de reserves the right to edit or delete comments or not to publish them. This applies in particular to defamatory, racist, personal, or irrelevant comments or comments written in dialects or languages other than English. Comments submitted by readers using fantasy names or intentionally false names will not be published. Qantara.de will not provide information on the telephone. Readers' comments can be found by Google and other search engines.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

Comments for this article: Debunking the ʹclash of civilisationsʹ myth

There is a mention of the economic, political and geopoitical interests, but only in passing without elaboration. The expansion of capitalism, colonialism, and later imperialism (a word missing in the article) determined the new relationship between "the West" and "Islam". It is the missionary objective of making "Islam" liberal that shaped the form of antagonism. One does not have to go back to the Crusades, but to analyse how capitalism and imperialism have been encroaching on most of the world. Liberals dismiss such an argument as leftist, because they have a tendency to ignore relationships of interests such as those with Muslim dictators, Wahhabists, Mujahidins, etc and ally with Muslim liberals who help expand "liberal values", i.e. capitalist values in the "Islamic world." Thus state terrorism is justified, but the terrorism of the terrorized is not. Assad should remain in power because he is a "secular Muslim." "Secularism" is also defined and imposed by an imperialist West as a truth that should go hand in hand with the expansion of capital: homogenizing the world, recreating the world in the "Western image." Muslims who reject such a mission are described as suffering from an illness that should be treated or bombed if necessary. As long as class and capitalist and race analysis is relegated to the background, this so-called "building a bridge between civilisations" will not achieve anything substantial.

Nadeem12.06.2018 | 14:02 Uhr