Responses to the inflammatory anti-Islamic film currently seen in Arab and Muslim nations are much worse than the film itself. These expressions of extremism are destroying all decency and civilised behaviour. A commentary by Khaled Hroub
What has happened to a faith community in which the Koran says: "No one is to blame for the actions of others?" Where does this abandonment to instinct come from, this extremism and demagoguery currently in evidence in reactions to a dumb film bearing the title "The Innocence of Muslims"? Such reactions defend nothing, and only inflict damage. They destroy our societies and cast them back to a primitive, underdeveloped state.
Why does this film drive people to smash up Kentucky Fried Chicken or McDonalds restaurants in Tripoli? What part in all of this was played by Columbian peacekeeping troops, attacked by locals at their base in the Sinai desert? And what makes the embassies of Germany and Italy in Khartoum a target for "angry masses" reacting to this film?
What blame is carried by car owners whose vehicles are trashed because they have parked them on the road leading to the US embassy in Tunis? And who bears the responsibility for those who were killed or injured in the attacks on embassies and everything western? Finally, what of the blame assigned to the US ambassador and his staff murdered in Benghazi – people who had not even heard of the video? They represented a country that supported the Libyans in their rebellion against a tyrannical leader who subjugated their country for four decades.
The worst thing that we are currently experiencing is not this stupid film and its insulting content. As far as we can tell from the excerpts posted on the Internet, this is a lousy effort that is so pathetic, from the point of view of both content and aesthetics, that the only US cinema showing the film this summer shelved it after a couple of screenings. This is not a complex piece of work that presents intelligently packaged blasphemy, or that stimulates reflection. The insults are so down-at-heel that the only proper response should be to confidently ignore them.
A culture of religious fanaticism
Much worse and much more horrifying than the film itself are the reactions to it that we are currently seeing in Arab and Muslim nations, and how this extremism is destroying all decency and civilised behaviour. We are experiencing a culture of religious fanaticism that has contaminated the minds of the people for more than half a century. The lack of all sense, thought and self-assurance is striking - instead, instincts are being allowed to run riot.
At one point the Koran states: "Most people are not believers, as much as you would wish it to be so." And most people in this world are not Muslims, and consequently they do not regard religions and prophets as sacred, and we cannot force this respect upon them.
Dialogue and debate remain the only effective methods, but these only function if parties can demonstrate a measure of self-assurance. If, on the other hand, millions of people lose control simply because of a dumb insult, then it only goes to prove that they cannot even confidently represent the values they pretend to defend. They suggest that the very essence of these values is threatened by flippant insults and the slightest criticism.
One may interject that the West is hypocritical because it allows this debasement of Muslims but will not tolerate any insults directed at Jews and Israel. This might well be the case, but this is not my concern here. I am not defending the policies of the West, but rather I am talking about us and the catastrophes that are occurring in our societies.
Rational thinking deactivated
We have lost all sense of measure. How else can it be that the malicious director of a bad film draws tens of thousands of demonstrators onto the streets, whereas in Syria, much fewer people are protesting at the daily killing of hundreds of their kinsmen? Even fewer are demonstrating for Jerusalem, or for Gaza. Mass instinct and a herd mentality deactivate rational thinking.
It is quite possible that no one would have discovered the existence of the said film, and it would have sunk into oblivion if no one had paid any heed to it, which would have defeated its very purpose: to inflict the greatest possible damage on Islam and the Muslims. The opposite has happened. The film has secured its place in posterity; millions of people are now trying to at least view part of it online.
The fanning of base instincts
The problem is that such scenarios are repeated every year, and no one learns anything from it. The fanning of base instincts began with the fatwa against Salman Rushdie's "Satanic Verses" in the 1980s. Khomeini tried to be imam for all the faithful, casting himself as a defender of Islam – thereby shooting an average writer to fame and ensuring his book became a global bestseller.
We experienced the "world war of instincts" yet again with the Danish cartoon row several years ago. By drawing a few racist caricatures, a single illustrator drove millions of Muslims onto the streets, resulting in death and destruction in many cities across the Muslim world. Again, an unknown illustrator became a world-famous hero, and his cartoons were disseminated across the world.
The list of examples goes on and on. They are all sad and repellent. The most worrying and dangerous thing about them though is how the advancing radicalisation is threatening our own societies. Election results since the beginning of the Arab Spring appear to be accelerating this tendency, and it is incumbent upon the more intelligent opinion formers of these nations to regard religious extremism as an enemy much more dangerous than all foreign enemies.
The mob currently rampaging through the streets is ready to destroy anything in its path, and possibly ready to kill. The thought structure of these masses rests on the exclusion of others, on the non-recognition of others and the desire to be rid of these others – and this in nations that are themselves multi-religious and multi-ethnic.
But extremism and mass instinct can only serve to undermine the very group that exhibits these traits, even if this group thinks it is countering an opponent. By shooting themselves in the foot, the extremists are ensuring that opponent will win.
© Qantara.de 2012
The journalist and media specialist Khaled Hroub is Director of the "Cambridge Arab Media Project" at the University of Cambridge. His book "Hamas – A Beginner's Guide" has been published into various languages.
Translation: Nina Coon
Editor: Lewis Gropp/Qantara.de