"Placing Muslims under general suspicion is not the solution"
Abominable allegedly Islamic terrorism has forced its way back into our consciousness in the shape of the barbaric acts of violence committed recently in Vienna, Nice and in a Paris suburb. We are all sick of hearing news like this. What can be said or written about such atrocities? How can something so indescribably appalling be described in words?
Yet after a while, we begin to realise that we know exactly what can be said or written. We have heard it and read it all too many times before. For about ten years now, we have been hearing the same sentences over and over from the most varied quarters. Politicians express their consternation and their sympathy.
Representatives of the Muslim community and Muslim associations distance themselves from the acts of terror. Both Muslim and non-Muslim critics of such associations accuse them of not distancing themselves enough or not doing enough. The Muslim associations in turn point out that the extremists did not attend mosques, which means there is a limit to what they can do.
At the same time, right-wing radicals gleefully pull out of their sleeves their ready-made messages of anti-Muslim hate and call on people to fight Islam. The actors have their scripts. They wait for their entrances. Nothing ever changes. Just like in the theatre: after the performance is before the performance.
Failings of the state and the Muslim community
The author of these lines has also written at length about the origins of this allegedly Islamic terrorism. The same applies to possible measures that can be taken to counter this form of extremism.
One could, of course, write once again about the specific problems of the French state, which make our neighbour so susceptible to this brand of terrorism: the colonial history that has never been properly addressed, the pressure to assimilate in French society and the associated anti-Muslim sentiment, France's lack of an academic tradition of Islamic theology resulting from its state principle of laicism, or the social problems and economic failings of the grande nation that have led to a ghettoisation of the suburbs.
One would, however, also have to mention in the same breath the deficits of the Muslim community in France: the establishment of islands of failure by replicating the social structures of their native countries, the lack of understanding for the principle of freedom of expression in the Western hemisphere that had to be fought for – in the face of both Church oppression and resistance to the Church, but also the lack of intellectual capacity to differentiate between caricatures and the Prophet Muhammad, or to respond intelligently to perceived provocations.
One could also point out that Germany has done many things much better than its neighbour France in terms of its policies on integration and religion and that this is why Germany doesn't have the problem of the permanent marginalisation of Muslim citizens, which fosters reactionary violence.
But numerous other writers are already doing this and, in this case too, adhering to the script. Nothing changes – except for the relatives and families of the victims. For them, nothing will ever be as it was.