Debate on Günter Grass's Israel-Iran PoemThe Old Man and the Stereotype
It is more than heartening when poetry is for once allowed to lead more than a niche existence in this country. When was the last time half the population was deep in discussion about a poem?
The only problem is that this seems to be the only encouraging aspect that will ever be associated with Günter Grass's "Was gesagt werden muss" ("What Must Be Said"), and this is by no means because the lines don't rhyme. The poem has indeed hit a chord, but the wrong one – just as off-key as many of the reactions to it.
It's not a matter of how Grass criticises the Israeli government for its policy toward Iran. This kind of criticism is a daily occurrence and only too justified. No, the problem is that Grass has taken advantage of the publication of his poem to do something completely different: he apologises for keeping his mouth shut for so long by claiming he was afraid of being stamped an anti-Semite.
False and perfidious
But this statement is false and perfidious. The voices, including German-speaking ones, criticising the course taken by the Netanyahu regime as dangerous are in fact too numerous to count. And naturally it has not the least bit to do with anti-Semitism when someone openly and publicly expresses rejection of Israel's Iran policy.
When Grass however claims just that, then he is inventing a taboo that doesn't exist.
This only serves to generate new prejudices. And then it's all part of the same picture when Grass censures the Tehran regime in only a few mild words, while objecting much more plainly and at length to Israel's nuclear power.
The scandal lies therefore not in Grass's criticism of Israel, but in the way he is using his words to style himself a martyr of the Jews, who allegedly use the charge of anti-Semitism as a bludgeon to censor the truth.
That is an anti-Semitic stereotype. Yet this is something neither conservative politicians have grasped who are coming down hard on the supposedly left-wing Grass, nor the left wing itself, which supports Grass because it sees him as one of its own.
Both sides are acting merely reflexively. Grass's poem serves them only as a cheap swing at their political opponents, a way to hit them with a right – or left – hook.
The truth is worse. After all, it's hardly very important if an ageing writer who evidently suffers under a certain amount of hubris criticises Israel and expresses fear of atomic war in the process. But it is a disaster when a German Nobel laureate in literature stoops to anti-Semitic stereotypes.
© Die Tageszeitung / Qantara.de 2012
Klaus Hillenbrand is co-director of the "taz.eins” department.
Translated from the German by Jennifer Taylor
Qantara.de editor: Lewis Gropp