Human rights court upholds burka ban in France
An unfortunate ruling

Does the burka ban supported by the European Court of Human Rights help oppressed women? No, says Heribert Prantl: it's more likely to breed resentment

The veiling of Muslim women is an unsettling matter. But their forced unveiling is even more unsettling. Punishing women who wear full-body veils, known as burkas, is a form of state violence.

Such violence improves nothing: it is an obstacle to integration. The sanction against the burka leads to the negation of the values such sanctions are intended to bolster. The punishment will mean that it may become an act of female empowerment to reject the ban.

The right to self-determination

A fully-veiled woman in Paris walking in the street alongside a woman in a T-shirt. Claude Paris/AP/dapd
France's burqa ban deemed legal: In future, any woman who goes out in public wearing the full veil must reckon with a fine. The European Court of Human Rights has approved the French legislation. One Muslim woman has already sued, citing infringement of her constitutional rights

In saying it has nothing against punishing women who wear burkas, the European Court of Human Rights has issued a questionable verdict. The state should only interfere with a person's right to self-determination when that right infringes upon those of others. But we have no right to see another person's face, or to communicate with him or her. In fact, as Judge Nussberger said in her dissenting vote, a person has the right to be an outsider. The Court of Human Rights exists to protect the rights of such outsiders.

Employers can forbid employees to wear burkas – for example, at the cash register in the supermarket. The state, however, cannot do the same. Does the burka ban help oppressed women? No – it's more likely to breed resentment. The verdict is unfortunate, and does nothing to redress the misfortune of women who are forced to wear the veil.

Heribert Prantl

© Süddeutsche Zeitung 2014

Translated from the German by Greg Wiser

Editor: Charlotte Collins/

Dr. Heribert Prantl is one of the editors-in-chief at the "Süddeutsche Zeitung" and head of the paper's domestic politics department.

More on this topic

Comments for this article: An unfortunate ruling

I just wanted to point out the incongruence of the paragraph heading "The right to self-determination", and the conclusion of it ... "The verdict is unfortunate, and does nothing to redress the misfortune of women who are forced to wear the veil." If these women are forced to wear the veil, it is obvious that it goes against the constitution, and their rights as citizens of the republic. If they choose to wear it, then the matter is obviously debatable.

Jose Castro26.08.2016 | 14:57 Uhr