''Germany is Making Itself a Laughing Stock''

Circumcision is a stipulation of the Prophet and therefore non-negotiable. In an interview with Eren Güvercin, Feridun Zaimoglu makes a resolute plea for the impunity of this Jewish and Muslim ritual

By Eren Güvercin

As a German Muslim who – in your own words – was brought up by his parents in "Prussian-Ottoman" fashion, you were certainly circumcised as a child, as prescribed by Islam. Were you traumatised by the experience?

Feridun Zaimoglu: The day before the circumcision, my mother took me by the hand and walked with me through the streets of our neighbourhood. I was dressed in a white prince outfit. Children ran past and touched me. Young women and older ladies smiled at me, stroked my cheeks and hair. They were neither encouraging me to be brave, nor spurring me on. They were beaming, and I regarded them with awe. I received small gifts: a bag of marbles, handkerchiefs perfumed with violets, a comb and shoelaces.

The next day, towards evening, the circumciser came. He spoke to me as though I was a small adult. I sat on a chair, and an uncle from my mother's side of the family stood on my left. An uncle from my father's side of the family was standing to my right – he offered reassuring words to my mother, who was standing in the doorway. It happened very quickly; before I noticed anything I was in my mother's arms. Relatives and friends clapped and cried out: "It's all done now – praise be to God!" I had been transformed from an uncircumcised boy into a circumcised Muslim.

We are now hearing from doctors, lawyers and other commentators who regard the circumcision of children as bodily harm and emphasise the importance of children's rights. Are Muslim, Jewish and other parents who have their children circumcised violating their children's rights?

German Chancellor Angela Merkel recently warned that Germany would make itself a "laughing stock" if it were to ban circumcision; Feridun Zaimoglu thinks that the debate itself has made it so

​​Zaimoglu: It should not be forgotten – and this case is no exception – that contemporary experts are mere interpreters. Let's just recall the headscarf debate, which saw right-wing conservatives championing women's rights. Those who hate Muslims will use any means at their disposal. Yesterday a feminist, today a protector of the lost foreskin. My goodness, we're talking about a small piece of skin covering the tip of the penis. Snip snip, off it comes, boy damaged for life? It would be crazy to believe that.

How far do the parental rights of those wanting to raise their children in accordance with the stipulations of their faith extend? After all, although it may only be a minor procedure, does it not represent interference in the physical integrity of a small child?

Zaimoglu: Many devout lunatics cripple their children in the name of their faith. These children should be removed from their care. After all, children are removed from the care of alcoholics, violent men and young mothers who are unable to cope. But circumcision is not genital mutilation, amputation or castration. The state should not overstretch itself. Otherwise the faithful might start thinking they can withhold from Caesar what belongs to Caesar.

The anti-circumcision movement originates in the US. As far back as 1997, the writer Ronald Goldman aimed to expose circumcision as a "hidden trauma". The circumcision rate in the US has declined rapidly ever since. Only 55 percent of American men are circumcised, although this still represents a majority. What will be the impact of the current debate in Germany?

Zaimoglu: What happened after the debate over the headscarf worn by devout young women? Nothing. These tin-pot philosophers, who earn money for chiding Islam, were duly rewarded for their work. Now these ladies and gentlemen are sniffing around men's nether regions. Sooner or later, those who perceive themselves to be enlightened end up in other people's bedrooms. Increasing numbers of clueless people are addressing me these days. Even though they can't formulate a correct German sentence, they just parrot everything they've heard. Now you're asking me if I'm circumcised. Germany is making itself a laughing stock.

Popular German author Feridun Zaimoglu considers the current debate about circumcision in Germany to be yet another topic that can be abused by latent Islamophobes to take a swipe at Islam

​​

There are suspicions of an anti-religious subtext in reporting on this issue to date. This would also include the campaign in favour of removing children from their parents' care and giving the state parental rights, in order to take the child out of its religious community. As a German Muslim, how do you view this debate over centuries' old religious traditions in our secular society?

Zaimoglu: Those who enforce the Zeitgeist don't like to hear it, but the believer has immunised himself against condemnation. The enemy of religion will do almost anything for his five minutes of fame. His world does not include worship of the Lord. His concept: spatial hygiene. His weapons: words that drip with poison, insinuation, mere assertion, self-inebriation. Contemporary peddlers of religious criticism are image-neurotics. They aim to abolish, persecute, destroy, vilify, censor. In a secular state, no party and no school of thought can risk causing discord. Circumcision is a stipulation of the Prophet and therefore non-negotiable. The believer believes. The liberal bends and bows until divine love degenerates into nothing but a tapestry of ideas.

Can the current debate be described as a clash of civilizations between secularism and religion?

Zaimoglu: I would recommend a period of calm: prattle and rumour may unsettle us, but to put up a front against the chatterers and whisperers would be a mistake. It's certainly strange that the state often rewards rabble-rousing sisters for the apparent risks they take when engaging in conflict. What I see, however, are cantankerous, nagging women crashing though the undergrowth like wild sows. They present themselves as cultural combatants, as humanists. They can't even spell refinement and philanthropy. It's best to keep a safe distance from louts.

Green Party politician Volker Beck recently said that atheism can also adopt fundamentalist traits. What does that mean for religious people in Germany? How should they respond to this development?

Zaimoglu: The believer is promised the love of God. And yet he has not estranged himself from the world. He frequently stands as a figure of ridicule as the spittle of mockery rains down on him. What can he do? Pray to God. Grin, if he is perceived as a social miscreant.

Interview: Eren Güvercin

© Qantara.de 2012

German-Turkish author Feridun Zaimoglu is one of Germany's shining literary stars, perhaps best known for his hit novel Leyla. He was awarded the Hebbel Prize in 2002, the Jury Prize at the Bachmann literary festival in Klagenfurt in 2003, and the Adelbert von Chamisso Prize in 2004. In 2005, he received a scholarship from the Villa Massimo in Rome. Other accolades include the Hugo Ball Prize, the Grimmelshausen Prize, the Corine Prize for his last novel Liebesbrand (Blazing Love) and the Jakob Wassermann Literature Prize.

Translated from the German by Nina Coon

Editor: Aingeal Flanagan/Qantara.de