Past betrayals haunt Afghans as new peace deal looms

28.02.2020

Afghanistan was at a critical crossroads around a quarter of a century ago after years of war, infighting and bloodshed. The chieftains of the country's warring factions had agreed on a power-sharing agreement called the Mecca Accord to end a deadly civil war that broke out after the withdrawal of the invading Soviet army.

Burhanuddin Rabbani, Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, Ahmed Shah Massoud and others first gathered in Pakistan in 1993 and in the city of Mecca a week later to seal the deal. "It looked perfect ... Everybody was hopeful for peace," analyst Fida Khan said of the accord brokered by the late Saudi king Fahd and the then Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.  

"This accord was signed in the holiest of Muslim cities and no one would dare break it," said Sharif, "If anyone does, he will be answerable to God." 

But Sharif's excitement and the Afghans' resolve proved short-lived as the civil war got bloodier, murkier and uglier within weeks.

"The lack of coordination between the parties involved in the Mecca Accord caused political and social fractures," said Hafiz ul-Rahman Naqi, a close aide of Hekmatyar.  

An attempt to salvage the shredded deal through another agreement called the Jalalabad Accord also ended up in smoke amid the deafening sounds of rockets hitting the capital Kabul. The failure gave rise to the Taliban militia within a couple of years, which swept to power across almost all of the country in 1995.

Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida established a foothold in the Afghanistan of the Taliban, planned and executed attacks in the United States on September 11, 2001, and the country was plunged into another war.

Afghanistan is at another crossroads now, similar to the one that pushed the country into the darks alleys of bloodshed and destruction in 1993.

The U.S. and the political representatives of the Taliban are set to sign a deal this weekend to seek a way out of the 19-year-old conflict, the longest running in contemporary history. The signing ceremony in Qatar, influential despite being the smallest state in the Persian Gulf, is being held after the Taliban pledged to reduce violence in Afghanistan and largely honoured that pledge.

While there was a lot of hope that the move would pave the way for lasting peace in Afghanistan, observers warned the journey ahead could be long drawn-out, frustrating and prone to risks.

"The current situation is fluid. If not controlled, it will be a repeat of 1993's mistakes," warned Naqi, in a reference to the controversy surrounding the re-election of President Ashraf Ghani.

Afghan election authorities announced this month that Ghani had been re-elected for a second term. But his closest opponent, Abdullah Abdullah, refused to accept the results and vowed to form a parallel administration.

"The deal between the U.S. and the Taliban is just a beginning," said Mohamed Mehdi, an analyst based in the Pakistani city of Lahore. "The real test will be when the militia and the administration in Kabul begin their talks." 

Under the proposed deal to be signed on Saturday, the Taliban would begin a dialogue with the Afghan government for the final settlement to end two decades of war.

"For the success of that dialogue, there has to be a stable and inclusive administration in Kabul. Confusions and fissures won't help," Mehdi said. Another significant factor to determine the outcome would be if and to which extent Washington maintains oversight on the process, the analyst added.

U.S. administrations and the Pentagon kept supporting Mujahideen groups in Afghanistan throughout 1980s when they fought against the Soviet army, but abandoned them once Russia withdrew.

"The Americans' abrupt decision to leave the region in the 80s created a void that triggered the civil war and ultimately the rise of the Taliban in the 90s," analyst Fida Khan explained.

Pakistani intelligence officials said they hope the deal would envisage a reduction in the number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan and not their complete withdrawal. Though the Taliban had been adamant on the complete withdrawal of all foreign troops, these officials said they might agree to a different arrangement in the end. 

"The Americans will have to see things home till the final settlement, no matter how long it takes," Khan said, "This is the only way to achieve peace."

"And if the U.S. leaves Afghanistan on its own out of frustration or changing priorities, they might have to come again in a few years to fight another al-Qaida," Khan warned and Mehdi agreed.    (dpa)

 

More on this topic