Violence flares in the Middle East

Foreign Affairs: "Paradigm Lost" – From two-state solution to one-state reality

Once a supporter of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Ian S. Lustick now deems that goal a deceptively Solomonic, and often disingenuous, approach to avoiding a "one-state reality". Lisa Anderson read the book

In a series of connected essays, Lustick examines the forces in Israeli history and politics that have contributed to the failure of the two-state solution, including the long-standing Zionist expectation that defeat would force Arab hands but require no concessions by Israel, a culture of profound mistrust of adversaries shaped by the legacy of the Holocaust, and U.S. indulgence of Israeli anxieties, which encouraged belligerence and discouraged compromise.

Lustick argues that a paradigm shift – a change in the conceptual framework that guides policymakers and activists – is necessary, and he puts forward his case concisely, vigorously, and candidly.

His argument is compelling: whatever promise it once held, the two-state solution is now dead. But in light of the continuing expansive ambitions of Israeli leadership and the simultaneous decay of vision and dynamism among the Palestinians, it is hard to know what exactly should replace the old paradigm.

Read more at Foreign Affairs


© Foreign Affairs 2021


You may also like:

End of the Middle East two-state solution? Israeli highways – a fast track to West Bank annexation

Noam Chomsky and Ilan Pappe in dialogue: A one- or two-state solution?

Special political zones for the Middle East: Beyond the two-state solution

More on this topic