Domestic power struggle in Tunisia

A faltering democracy

The most promising democratic experiment in the Arab world can still avert political disaster, but Tunisia urgently needs outside help in view of the ongoing trench warfare within the government, writes Youssef Cherif in his essay

When anti-government protests swept across the Arab world in 2011, Tunisia seemed poised to emerge better off. Yet, by 2013, the democratic process was almost derailed by unfulfilled economic promises, political and ideological disagreements and foreign meddling. Fortunately, local and international mediation then helped to avert catastrophe and pave the way for elections.

But less than a year before the next general election, scheduled for late 2019, the country is again in crisis. This time, however, mediators are either disinterested in solutions or part of the problem.

In a world focused on the war in Syria, instability in Libya, Russian assertiveness, European uncertainty and the tweets of an isolationist American president, Tunisia has faded from the headlines. Tunisiaʹs democratic breakdown would, one assumes, attract international attention; but by then, it will be too late.

Political trench warfare

The current stalemate began soon after the December 2014 presidential election. In February 2015, President Beji Caid Essebsi, founder of the secular political party Nidaa Tounes, struck a deal with Rached Ghannouchi, president of the moderate Islamist Ennahda Party, to form a coalition government. But soon after, Nidaa Tounes was beset by infighting and, in January 2016, dozens of the partyʹs MPs resigned in protest, giving Ennahda a parliamentary majority.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Youssef Chahed, Essebsiʹs protege and appointee, has been challenging the 92-year-old presidentʹs inner circle, throwing Nidaa Tounes further into chaos. By mid-2018, as the partyʹs turmoil peaked, Ghannouchi was supporting Chahed rather than the presidentʹs son and groomed heir, Hafedh Caid Essebsi. The president, reacting either to a sense of betrayal or out of fear for his legacy, responded by renewing his criticism of Ennahda and by launching an investigation into allegations that Ghannouchiʹs party is tied to terrorism.

Tunisiaʹs Prime Minister Youssef Chahed (photo: picture-alliance/dpa)
From former companion and ally to political adversary: in the meantime Prime Minister Youssef Chahed, protected and appointed by Essebsi, has challenged the 92-year-old president's inner circle and thrown Nidaa Tounes even deeper into chaos, says Youssef Cherif

Moreover, Essebsi and his clan embraced populist rhetoric and restarted courting the anti-Islamist Saudi-Emirati-Egyptian axis. Essebsi even endorsed a law to give men and women equal inheritance rights, a measure that is supported by many secular Tunisians and praised by the international community, but loathed by Ennahdaʹs conservative base.

Ongoing rumours of revolt

Amid this brewing political turmoil, rumours of coups and attempted coups have intensified. In June 2018, Tunisiaʹs interior minister was fired over an alleged coup attempt. In November, Nidaa Tounesʹ secretary-general accused Chahed of planning his own putsch. In December, Qatari-backed news outlets warned of a Saudi-Emirati plot to stage a coup in Tunisia. And every now and then, Tunisian social media buzzes with unfounded rumours of army movements. It seems as if trial balloons are being floated.

In a well-functioning democracy, an early election would have been called in September 2018, when the governing coalition felt apart and perhaps as early as 2016, when Nidaa Tounes lost its majority in parliament. But most Tunisian political parties suffer too much dissension or are too weak to run. And the current ructions are even jeopardising the work of the Independent High Authority for Elections.

There is now a real risk that the 2019 elections will be postponed. For a fragile democracy led by a nonagenarian, saddled by an endless state of emergency and lacking a constitutional court, this delay may prove fatal.

From a state-centred economy to an IMF transition economy

Tunisiaʹs political crisis is occurring alongside an economic one. As Tunisia has moved from a controlled economy under dictatorship to a transitional one marked by austerity measures and structural reforms dictated by the International Monetary Fund, corruption has spread and investors have fled. Today, with public debt, unemployment and inflation growing, strikes and protests are increasingly common and support for democracy – frequently portrayed as the cause of the current tumult – has dwindled.

Demonstrators during the two-day general strike in Tunis on 17 January 2019 (photo: Reuters)
Declaring war on the government and the country's neoliberal austerity measures: last week, the UGTT union called a general strike of some 677,000 civil servants and 350,000 employees of state-owned companies. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has imposed strict austerity measures on Tunisia, including a reduction in the size of the bloated public sector. Since the overthrow of long-term ruler Zine el Abidine Ben Ali, Tunisia has achieved far-reaching democratic reforms, but the country is dependent on international aid

Ennahda, an economically liberal party that draws important support from informal economic circles and outside the public sector, backed the IMFʹs economic reforms; the Tunisian General Labour Union (UGTT), which represents public-sector workers, did not. Leftists and many remnants of the former regime were also opposed. Chahed, meanwhile, was aggressive in implementing the IMF-backed reforms, in part to win support from abroad. But his approach put the UGTT, alongside old-guard politicians and some key socioeconomic groups, on the same side as Essebsi. In fact, the UGTT led the mediations during the crisis of 2013.

Foreign influence is another destabilising factor. Today, Tunisia is a geopolitical battlefield for regional powers like Egypt, Turkey and the Gulf states and Tunisian politicians occasionally take sides to suit their suitorsʹ goals. Broadly speaking, Saudi Arabia and the UAE demonise Tunisiaʹs democracy and Ennahda, while Qatar and Turkey laud both. Both camps have their clients in the country. These players amplify coup rumours and delegitimise Tunisiaʹs political independence, which adds to the publicʹs distrust of the government. Back in 2013, the US, Europe and Algeria limited the reach of these countries. Ironically, in 2018, it is the US, the EU and Algeria that are rattled by internal divisions and terrified of foreign interference.

History holds many lessons for those navigating Tunisiaʹs tumult, with some particularly apt parallels to be found in Russiaʹs post-Soviet transition. There, during his final years in power, a weakened Boris Yeltsin sought to secure his presidential legacy and save his family from prosecution. Hence, the so-called "father of Russian democracy" appointed then-Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, a former KGB officer, to succeed him. Russiaʹs democracy never recovered.

Tunisiaʹs in-fighting and nepotistic policies have a similar feel. The Arab worldʹs most promising democratic experiment can still avert a political meltdown, but it needs help. Local and international mediators guided Tunisia from turmoil once before. They must do so again.

Youssef Cherif

© Project Syndicate 2019

Youssef Cherif is a Tunis-based political analyst, member of the Carnegie Civic Research Network and head of Columbia Global Centers Tunis.

More on this topic
In submitting this comment, the reader accepts the following terms and conditions: Qantara.de reserves the right to edit or delete comments or not to publish them. This applies in particular to defamatory, racist, personal, or irrelevant comments or comments written in dialects or languages other than English. Comments submitted by readers using fantasy names or intentionally false names will not be published. Qantara.de will not provide information on the telephone. Readers' comments can be found by Google and other search engines.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.